A method for extracting mycotoxins from grain, other food products and animal feed

ABSTRACT

The invention relates to a method for extracting mycotoxins from grain and other food products or from feed and its subsequent quantification. Fields of application are the food industry, the animal feed industry or biotechnology. The objective of the present invention was to develop an extraction method with which it is possible to uniformly extract mycotoxins with different dissolving properties. It was found that with the aid of aqueous, buffered naphthyl and/or phenyl compounds or their heterocyclical analogues, both hydrophobic and hydrophilic mycotoxins can be extracted. The method is characterized in that the buffered solutions of naphthyl and/or phenyl compounds and/or their heterocyclical analogues, which carry at least one sulphonic acid or at least one carbonate acid group, are brought into contact with the grain or other food products or animal feed, the aqueous solution is separated and the content of the extracted mycotoxins in the solution is determined.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to a method for extracting mycotoxins from grain and other food products or from animal feed and its subsequent quantification. Fields of application are the food industry, the animal feed industry or biotechnology.

BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION

Mycotoxins are secondary metabolic products formed by mould fungi that can already have a toxic effect among vertebrae even in tiny quantities. Currently, around 200 different mycotoxins are known, which are formed by over 300 types of fungus. The term “mycotoxins” comprises a series of chemical compounds with different structures and effects, which can be classified as the following substance groups: Aflatoxins, ochratoxins, trichothecenes such as deoxynivalenol, fumonisins, alternaria toxins, fusarium toxins, ergot alkaloids.

Of particular importance in the food and animal feed industries are mycotoxins of the aflatoxin group, the fumonisin group, ochratoxin A, deoxynivalenol (DON), HT-2-toxin (or HT2), T-2-toxin (or T2) and zearalenone. Due to their extremely high hazard potential and broad dissemination, the tiniest quantities in food products or animal feed can already acutely or chronically impair the health of humans and animals. For this reason, legislators worldwide have set limit values for the different mycotoxins in different matrices, which are valid at national level. As an example, reference is made to EU directive 1881 from 2006. Further, in this context, minimal standards for test systems (e.g. ELISA) were determined in the EU by directive 519 from 2014. For this reason, there is an extraordinarily high level of interest in examining food products or animal feed for any mycotoxin contamination. Here, the fact has proven to be problematic in the past that the aforementioned mycotoxins are extremely heterogeneous in terms of their molecular structure, and therefore have a wide range of properties such as different dissolving properties. Thus, the hydrophobic aflatoxins are indissoluble in water, while by contrast, the fumonisins and deoxynivalenol are soluble in water (FIG. 1). For this reason, aflatoxins must be extracted from a sample using water-methanol or water-ethanol mixtures. The other mycotoxins, such as T2 and HT2 (FIG. 1) are at a medium level with regard to their polarity and extractability, although they also require solvents such as methanol for extraction.

State of the Art

To date, mycotoxins have been extracted using organic solvents such as ethanol, acetonitrile or methanol. However, large quantities of organic solvents are created during the process, which must then be disposed of. As an alternative, methods have been developed in which certain mycotoxins can be extracted through the addition of specific substances such as cyclodextrins, components containing proteins (e.g. cattle serum albumin) or solubilising agents (e.g. non-ionic tensides such as triton or Brij). Such methods without organic solvents have frequently been patented in recent years (US 2014/0356978; WO 2015/188205; WO 2016/057044). However, with regard to extractions without organic solvents, the extraction of ochratoxin is either not described or requires the use of a special buffer due to the carboxyl function contained in the molecule (Mishra et al., 2016, Food Add.Contam. 33: 500-508). An extraction method for all relevant mycotoxins has not yet been described.

Due to the aforementioned disadvantages, these methods are not the agent of choice in order to analyse food products such as grain samples for the presence of a wide range of mycotoxins quickly, simply, in an environmentally friendly manner and at low cost.

Goal and Objective of the Invention

The goal of the invention is to extract a wide range of mycotoxins (FIG. 1) from food products and animal feed in the most uniform manner possible with a single extraction agent.

From this, the objective of the present invention is derived of developing an extraction method with which it is possible to uniformly extract mycotoxins with different dissolving properties.

In particular, this results in the objective of extracting the mycotoxins aflatoxin, deoxynivalenol, ochratoxin A, zearalenone, fumonisin and T2/HT2 from grain (maize, wheat, rye, oats, barley and their relatives from the triticeae tribe), animal feed, nuts, soya, maize gluten and rice, as well as figs, dates, raisins and pistachios, and then to quantify them.

This objective is attained by means of a method according to claim 1. Further possible embodiments are presented in the subclaims, the description and the examples.

Nature of the Invention

Surprisingly, it has been found that with the aid of aqueous, buffered naphthyl and/or phenyl compounds or their heterocyclical analogues, both hydrophobic and hydrophilic mycotoxins can be extracted.

The method according to the invention is characterized in that the buffered solutions of naphthyl and/or phenyl compounds and/or their heterocyclical analogues, which carry at least one sulphonic acid or at least one carbonate acid group, are brought into contact with the grain or other food products or animal feed, the aqueous solution is then separated and the content of the extracted mycotoxins in the aqueous solution is determined.

According to the invention, naphthyl or phenyl compounds or their heterocyclical analogues of the general formula I are used individually or as a mixture in order to particularly effectively extract mycotoxins of a wide range of different groups.

in which X, R1 and R2 have the following meaning:

-   -   X=naphthyl or phenyl residue or its heterocyclical analogues     -   R1=at least one sulphonic acid group or at least one carbonic         acid group     -   R2=unsubstituted or selected from a functional group of hydroxy,         alkyl, alkoxy, amino, sulfhydryl, halogen and thioether, which         are arranged in the o, m or p position in relation to the acid         group in the molecule, whereby a-amino acids are excluded.

Examples are listed below that are capable of extracting mycotoxins of a wide range of different groups:

1,5-naphthyl disulphonic acid

2,6-naphthyl disulphonic acid

4-hydroxyphenylsulphonic acid

Benzenesulphonic acid

4-methyl benzenesulphonic acid

Benzene-1,3-disulphonic acid

1-naphthol-3,6-disulphonic acid

3-sulphobenzoic acid

4-sulphobenzoic acid

2-hydroxybenzoic acid

2,6-dihydroxybenzoic acid

2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid

2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid

3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid

3,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid

2-hydroxy-5-sulphobenzoic acid

The sole but also combined use of 1,5-naphtyldisulphonic acid, 2,6-naphthyldisulphonic acid and/or p-hydroxyphenyl sulphonic acid emerged as being particularly advantageous.

The result aqueous supernatant, which contains the extracted mycotoxins, is then separated and used for analysis. In this way, the determination or further purification of the mycotoxins can be achieved, for example with the aid of enzymatic, enzyme immunological, chromatographically supported and/or immuno-affinity chromatographic methods.

Certified reference materials (Table 1) are used for all tests described below. For each mycotoxin, a blank sample and a contaminated reference sample are measured.

TABLE 1 Certified mycotoxin reference materials for testing the extraction efficiency of the claimed method Mycotoxin Certified material (matrix) Reference value* Name** Aflatoxins n.d. AC 215 (maize) 31.2 ± 3.1 μg/kg AC 295 Ochratoxin n.d. OC 853 (maize) 12.3 ± 1.3 μg/kg OC 866 Deoxynivalenol n.d. DW 100 (wheat)  2.1 ± 0.3 mg/kg DW 174 Fumonisins n.d. FC 400 (maize)  0.5 ± 0.07 mg/kg FC 458 Zearalenone n.d. ZC 300 (maize) 472.1 ± 65.6 μg/kg ZC 321 T2/HT2 n.d. TC 978 (maize) 255.7 ± 18 μd/kg T2 and TC 982 681.1 ± 45.8 μg/kg HT2 *not detected using HPLC; see certificates from Trilogy for more detailed explanations, e.g. verification limit of the method used **Materials from Trilogy (Washington, MO, USA) were used

The invention will now be explained with reference to the determination of aflatoxin in maize. The reference extraction method provides for a sample weigh-in of 1 g, which is extracted with 5 ml 70% methanol in water for 10 min while shaking (Table 2). After centrifugation or filtration, the supernatant is diluted 1:7 with distilled water (e.g. 100 μL extract+600 μL water) and the aflatoxin content is quantified in a standard commercial ELISA. The RIDASCREEN® Aflatoxin Total (art. no. 4701, R-Biopharm AG, Darmstadt, see also Table 2) is used. The basis is the antigen-antibody reaction. The recesses in the microtitre plates are coated against anti-aflatoxin antibodies with capture antibodies. Calibrators or extracted sample solution, enzyme-marked aflatoxin (enzyme conjugate) and anti-aflatoxin antibodies are added. Free and enzyme-marked aflatoxin compete for the aflatoxin antibody binding sites. At the same time, the anti-aflatoxin antibodies are also bound by the immobilised capture antibodies. Non-bound enzyme-marked aflatoxin is then removed again in a washing step. Verification is conducted by adding substrate/chromogenic solution. Bound enzyme conjugate converts the chromogen into a blue end product. The addition of the stop reagent leads to a colour change from blue to yellow. The measurement is conducted photometrically at 450 nm; the measured optical density (OD) of the solution is conversely proportional to the aflatoxin concentration in the sample.

TABLE 2 Applied reference extraction and ELISA system used to compare the extraction efficiency of the claimed methods Mycotoxin (matrix) Reference extraction ELISA Aflatoxins 1 g sample + 5 ml 70% methanol in R4701 (RIDASCREEN ® (maize) water; dilution 1:7 with water Aflatoxin Total) Ochratoxin 1 g sample + 5 ml 130 mM NaHCO₃ R1311 (RIDASCREEN ® (maize) (pH 8.1); dilution 1:4 with water Ochratoxin A 30/15 Deoxynivalenol 1 g sample + 5 ml water; dilution 1:10 R5906 (RIDASCREEN ® (wheat) with water DON) Fumonisins 1 g sample + 5 ml 70% methanol in R3401 (RIDASCREEN ® (maize) water; dilution 1:14 with water Fumonisin) Zearalenone 1 g sample + 5 ml 70% methanol in R1401 (RIDASCREEN ® (maize) water; dilution with buffer Zearalenone) T2/HT2 1 g sample + 5 ml 70% methanol in R3805 (RIDASCREEN ® (maize) water; dilution 1:20 with water T2/HT2 Toxin

As an example, a preferred method for the extraction of aflatoxin from maize is described below. For this purpose, 1 g of homogenised maize sample with 5 ml of a solution consisting of 250 mM 1,5-naphthyl disulphonic acid buffered to pH 8 is mixed with 100 mM tris-(hydroxymethyl)-aminomethane (tris), shaken for 10 min and centrifuged or filtered. The clear supernatant is diluted 1:7 with distilled water and measured in the ELISA as already described above.

The results are shown in Table 3. Here, it should be noted that for comparability reasons, the results are given as a “signal reduction in %”. The signal reduction results from the competitive format of the ELISA as a test system. The extraction yield should be evaluated as a comparison between the new, claimed method and the established reference extraction. A high analyte concentration in the extract (caused by a high extraction yield) leads to a reduction of the measurement signal (OD_(450 nm)). The signal reduction in [%] is calculated as follows:

Signal reduction [%]=100−(OD_(positive sample)/OD_(negative sample)×100)

TABLE 3 Extraction yield of aflatoxin from maize using the claimed substance 1,5-naphthyl disulphonic acid (in tris buffer pH 8.0) compared to the reference extraction. The OD value was calculated in the commercially available ELISA RIDASCREEN ® Aflatoxin Total. Reference 250 mM 1,5-NDS + 100 extraction mM tris pH 8.0 OD_(Blank) 1.591 1.966 OD_(Positive) 0.474 0.525 Signal 71 73 reduction [%]

If one compares the values of the reference extraction with those of the claimed extraction, it becomes clear that these are very similar. Aflatoxin was thus successfully quantitatively extracted from the matrix maize using the claimed method. Slight differences in the OD values, above all of the blank samples, can be explained by secondary effects of the claimed substances in the ELISA measurement system. Through interactions, the competition for antibody binding sites between the aflatoxin from the extract (sample) and aflatoxin-enzyme conjugate is slightly disrupted. This is also the reason why no concentration values have been determined, but the results are instead given as “signal reduction [%]”. This would create a false picture, since the influencing of the ELISA is not a part of the claimed extraction. The ELISA systems can accordingly be set to such substances, so that the accuracy of the measurement system is provided.

Independently of the example given above, it is however also possible to study other samples from the food or animal feed area such as wheat, rye, oats, barley and their relatives from the triticeae tribe, animal feed, nuts, soya, maize gluten and rice. Furthermore, figs, dates, raisins and pistachios are also of interest.

Equally, the extraction is not limited to the above aflatoxins. Thus, it is also possible to extract deoxynivalenol, ochratoxin A, zearalenone, fumonisin and T2/HT2 with the method according to the invention. Equally, other toxins such as ergot alkaloids, citrinin and sterigmatocystin can be extracted with the method according to the invention.

Studies have shown that the effectiveness of the method is positively influenced by a suitable buffer system. Thus, the aqueous solution of naphthyl and/or phenyl compounds and/or their heterocyclical analogues should be buffered in the range of pH 5-10. Here, buffers containing tris-(hydroxy methyl)-aminomethane (tris) and “Imidazol” are preferred in the region of pH 7.5-8.5 (see example in Table 3). The “Imidazol” buffer was prepared by mixing the isopropylimidazol and Imidazol hydrochloride in the corresponding proportions. Other buffer systems such as phosphate and EPPS N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-piperazine-N′-(3-propane sulphonic acid) are also possible, but can have different extraction results depending on the concentration and mycotoxin.

An extraction method is also possible in which aromatic phenyl or naphthyl compounds are used with at least on position substituted with nitrogen.

The method has the advantage over the extraction methods known to date that all important mycotoxins can be extracted efficiently and almost entirely from relevant food product matrices with an environmentally friendly, aqueous extraction agent. Unlike the standard methods, the analysis of several different mycotoxins no longer requires separate sample weigh-ins and individual extraction agents, but simply a single sample weigh-in and universal extraction with the claimed method. This results in significant time and material savings for the user of this new method, which leads to a cost reduction and the avoidance of exposure to solvents from the extraction agents of standard methods, which are harmful to health.

The invention will now be explained in greater detail with reference to illustrative embodiments.

Illustrative Embodiments

EXAMPLE 1

TABLE 4 Extraction yield of aflatoxin from maize using the claimed substances 1,5-naphthyl disulphonic acid (1,5-NDS, 250 mM) using different buffers (100 mM) and pH values compared to reference extraction (ref., see also Table 2). The OD value was calculated in the commercially available ELISA RIDASCREEN ® Aflatoxin Total. 1,5-NDS 1,5-NDS 1,5-NDS 1,5-NDS Tris Tris Imidazol Imidazol Ref. pH 8.0 pH 8.5 pH 8.0 pH 8.5 OD_(Blank) 1.591 1.966 1.917 1.684 1.578 OD_(Positive) 0.474 0.525 0.491 0.401 0.326 Signal 71 73 74 76 79 reduction [%]

EXAMPLE 2

TABLE 5 Extraction yield of aflatoxin from maize using the claimed substances 2,6-naphthyl disulphonic acid (2,6-NDS, 125 mM) using different buffers (100 mM) and pH values compared to reference extraction (ref., see also Table 2). The OD value was calculated in the commercially available ELISA RIDASCREEN ® Aflatoxin Total. 2,6-NDS 2,6-NDS 2,6-NDS 2,6-NDS Tris Tris Imidazol Imidazol Ref. pH 8.0 pH 8.5 pH 8.0 pH 8.5 OD_(Blank) 1.505 1.686 1.711 1.654 1.645 OD_(Positive) 0.377 0.435 0.356 0.403 0.393 Signal 75 74 79 76 76 reduction [%]

EXAMPLE 3

TABLE 6 Extraction yield of aflatoxin from maize using the claimed substances 1,5-naphthyl disulphonic acid (1,5-NDS, 250 mM) using different buffers (100 mM) and pH values compared to reference extraction (ref., see also Table 2). The OD value was calculated in the commercially available ELISA RIDASCREEN ® DON. 1,5-NDS 1,5-NDS 1,5-NDS 1,5-NDS Tris Tris Imidazol Imidazol Ref. pH 8.0 pH 8.5 pH 8.0 pH 8.5 OD_(Blank) 2.440 2.682 2.722 2.649 2.638 OD_(Positive) 0.738 0.795 0.842 0.744 0.811 Signal 70 70 69 72 69 reduction [%]

EXAMPLE 4

TABLE 7 Extraction yield of aflatoxin from maize using the claimed substances 2,6-naphthyl disulphonic acid (2,6-NDS, 125 mM) using different buffers (100 mM) and pH values compared to reference extraction (ref., see also Table 2). The OD value was calculated in the commercially available ELISA RIDASCREEN ® DON. 2,6-NDS 2,6-NDS 2,6-NDS 2,6-NDS Tris Tris Imidazol Imidazol Ref. pH 8.0 pH 8.5 pH 8.0 pH 8.5 OD_(Blank) 2.463 2.694 2.667 2.610 2.657 OD_(Positive) 0.886 0.923 0.923 0.871 0.906 Signal 64 66 65 67 66 reduction [%]

EXAMPLE 5

TABLE 8 Extraction yield of aflatoxin from maize using the claimed substances 1,5-naphthyl disulphonic acid (1,5-NDS, 250 mM) using different buffers (100 mM) and pH values compared to reference extraction (ref., see also Table 2). The OD value was calculated in the commercially available ELISA RIDASCREEN ® Ochratoxin A 30/15. 1,5-NDS 1,5-NDS 1,5-NDS 1,5-NDS Tris Tris Imidazol Imidazol Ref. pH 8.0 pH 8.5 pH 8.0 pH 8.5 OD_(Blank) 1.551 1.447 1.374 1.479 1.277 OD_(Positive) 0.305 0.338 0.306 0.366 0.296 Signal 80 77 78 75 77 reduction [%]

EXAMPLE 6

TABLE 9 Extraction yield of ochratoxin A from maize using the claimed substances 2,6-naphthyl disulphonic acid (2,6- NDS, 125 mM) using different buffers (100 mM) and pH values compared to reference extraction (ref., see also Table 2). The OD value was calculated in the commercially available ELISA RIDASCREEN ® Ochratoxin A 30/15. 2,6-NDS 2,6-NDS 2,6-NDS 2,6-NDS Tris Tris Imidazol Imidazol Ref. pH 8.0 pH 8.5 pH 8.0 pH 8.5 OD_(Blank) 1.551 1.602 1.462 1.425 1.374 OD_(Positive) 0.305 0.407 0.309 0.324 0.263 Signal 80 75 79 77 81 reduction [%]

EXAMPLE 7

TABLE 10 Extraction yield of zearalenone from maize using the claimed substances 1,5-naphthyl disulphonic acid (1,5-NDS, 250 mM) or 2,6-naphthyl disulphonic acid using different buffers (2,6- NDS, 100 mM) and pH values compared to reference extraction (ref., see also Table 2). The OD value was calculated in the commercially available ELISA RIDASCREEN ® zearalenone. 1,5-NDS 1,5-NDS 2,6-NDS 2,6-NDS Tris Imidazol Tris Imidazol Ref. pH 8.0 pH 8.5 pH 8.0 pH 8.0 OD_(Blank) 3.093 2.594 2.540 2.403 2.214 OD_(Positive) 0.227 0.355 0.268 0.245 0.301 Signal 93 86 89 90 86 reduction [%]

EXAMPLE 8

TABLE 11 Extraction yield of fumonisin from maize using the claimed substances 1,5-naphthyl disulphonic acid (1,5-NDS, 50 mM) or 2,6-naphthyl disulphonic acid using different buffers (2,6- NDS, 100 mM) and pH values compared to reference extraction (ref., see also Table 2). The OD value was calculated in the commercially available ELISA RIDASCREEN ® fumonisin. 1,5-NDS 1,5-NDS 2,6-NDS 2,6-NDS Tris Imidazol Tris Imidazol Ref. pH 8.0 pH 8.0 pH 8.0 pH 8.0 OD_(Blank) 1.193 0.719 0.762 0.874 0.881 OD_(Positive) 0.339 0.174 0.151 0.202 0.188 Signal 72 76 80 77 79 reduction [%]

EXAMPLE 9

TABLE 12 Extraction yield of T2 and HT2 from maize using the claimed substances 1,5-naphthyl disulphonic acid (1,5-NDS, 250 mM) or 2,6-naphthyl disulphonic acid using different buffers (2,6- NDS, 100 mM) and pH values compared to reference extraction (ref., see also Table 2). The OD value was calculated in the commercially available ELISA RIDASCREEN ® T2/HT2. 1,5-NDS 1,5-NDS 2,6-NDS 2,6-NDS Tris Imidazol Tris Imidazol Ref. pH 8.0 pH 8.0 pH 8.0 pH 8.0 OD_(Blank) 1.676 0.947 0.921 0.868 0.799 OD_(Positive) 0.467 0.289 0.282 0.270 0.265 Signal 72 69 69 69 67 reduction [%]

EXAMPLE 10

TABLE 13 Extraction yield of aflatoxin from maize using the claimed substances 1,5-naphthyl disulphonic acid (1,5-NDS, 250 mM) or 2,6-naphthyl disulphonic acid (2,6-NDS, 100 mM) and pH values compared to reference extraction (ref., see also Table 2). The OD value was calculated in the commercially available ELISA RIDASCREEN ® Aflatoxin Total. 1,5-NDS 1,5-NDS 2,6-NDS 2,6-NDS Phosphate Epps* Phosphate Phosphate 200 mM 100 mM 25 mM 75 mM Ref. pH 8.0 pH 8.5 pH 8.0 pH 8.5 OD_(Blank) 1.487 1.542 1.607 1.474 1.445 OD_(Positive) 0.326 0.303 0.350 0.339 0.350 Signal 78 80 78 77 76 reduction [%] *(N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-piperazine-N′-(3-propane sulphonic acid)

EXAMPLE 11

TABLE 14 Extraction yield of aflatoxin from maize using the claimed substance 1,5-naphthyl disulphonic acid in different concentrations at pH 8.0 (5 mM phosphate) compared to reference extraction (ref., see also Table 2). The OD value was calculated in the commercially available ELISA RIDASCREEN ® Aflatoxin Total. 300 Ref. mM 200 mM 100 mM 50 mM 10 mM OD_(Blank) 1.320 1.516 1.611 1.601 1.596 1.601 OD_(Positive) 0.325 0.309 0.373 0.452 0.752 0.920 Signal 75 80 77 72 53 43 reduction [%]

EXAMPLE 12

TABLE 15 Extraction yield of aflatoxin from maize using the claimed substance 2,6-naphthyl disulphonic acid in different concentrations at pH 8.0 (5 mM phosphate) compared to reference extraction (ref., see also Table 2). The OD value was calculated in the commercially available ELISA RIDASCREEN ® Aflatoxin Total. Ref. 100 mM 75 mM 50 mM 10 mM 5 mM OD_(Blank) 1.544 1.860 1.854 1.881 1.962 1.973 OD_(Positive) 0.438 0.489 0.521 0.620 1.101 1.051 Signal 72 74 72 67 44 47 reduction [%]

EXAMPLE 13

TABLE 16 Extraction yield of deoxynivalenol, fumonisin and zearalenone (for matrices see Table 1) using the claimed substance 4-hydroxyphenyl sulphonic acid (375 mM; 4-OH-PSN) with the addition of 50 mM phosphate (pH 8.0) compared to the reference extraction (ref., see also Table 2). The OD value was calculated in the commercially available ELISA RIDASCREEN ® series (see Table 2). DON DON Fumo* Fumo* Zea* Zea* ref. 4-OH-PSN ref. 4-OH-PSN ref. 4-OH-PSN OD_(Blank) 2.337 2.577 1.261 0.814 3.012 2.338 OD_(Positive) 0.786 0.824 0.398 0.195 0.195 0.294 Signal 66 68 68 76 94 87 reduction [%] *DON, deoxynivalenol; fumo, fumonisin; zea, zearalenone

EXAMPLE 14

TABLE 17 Extraction yield of aflatoxin, ochratoxin and T2/HT2 (for matrices see Table 1) using the claimed substance 4-hydroxyphenyl sulphonic acid (375 mM; 4-OH- PSN) with the addition of 50 mM phosphate (pH 8.0) compared to the reference extraction (ref., see also Table 2). The OD value was calculated in the commercially available ELISA RIDASCREEN ® series (see Table 2). Afla* Afla* OTA* OTA* T2/HT2 T2/HT2 ref. 4-OH-PSN ref. 4-OH-PSN ref. 4-OH-PSN OD_(Blank) 1.701 1.821 1.551 1.557 1.889 0.965 OD_(Positive) 0.451 0.673 0.305 0.308 0.525 0.342 Signal 73 63 80 80 72 65 reduction [%] *Afla, aflatoxin; OTA, ochratoxin

EXAMPLE 15

TABLE 18 Extraction yield of aflatoxin from maize using the claimed substance 4- naphthyl disulphonic acid in different concentrations at pH 8.0 (5 mM phosphate) compared to reference extraction (ref., see also Table 2). The OD value was calculated in the commercially available ELISA RIDASCREEN ® Aflatoxin Total. Ref. 600 mM 500 mM 400 mM 300 mM 200 mM 100 mM OD_(Blank) 1.485 1.692 1.707 1.712 1.722 1.692 1.649 OD_(Positive) 0.440 0.512 0.533 0.547 0.568 0.676 0.855 Signal 70 70 69 68 67 60 48 reduction [%]

EXAMPLE 16

TABLE 19 Extraction yield of aflatoxin from maize using the claimed substance 4- naphthyl disulphonic acid in different concentrations at pH 8.0 (5 mM phosphate) compared to reference extraction (ref., see also Table 2). The OD value was calculated in the commercially available ELISA RIDASCREEN ® Ochratoxin A 30/15. Ref. 600 mM 500 mM 400 mM 300 mM 200 mM 50 mM OD_(Blank) 1.620 1.308 1.365 1.345 1.383 1.475 1.692 OD_(Positive) 0.239 0.264 0.229 0.264 0.241 0.267 0.309 Signal 85 80 83 80 83 82 82 reduction [%]

EXAMPLE 17

TABLE 20 Extraction yield of ochratoxin from maize with combined use of the claimed substances 1,5-naphthyl disulphonic acid (1,5-NDS, 250 mM) and 4-hydroxy phenyl sulphonic acid (different concentrations of 10 mM to 150 mM) at pH 8.0 (5 mM phosphate) compared to reference extraction (ref., see also Table 2). The OD value was calculated in the commercially available ELISA RIDASCREEN ® Ochratoxin A 30/15. 250 mM 1,5-NDS Ref. 150 mM 100 mM 75 mM 50 mM 20 mM 10 mM OD_(Blank) 1.551 1.120 1.231 1.360 1.352 1.494 1.495 OD_(Positive) 0.305 0.330 0.375 0.321 0.355 0.422 0.485 Signal 80 71 70 76 74 72 68 reduction [%]

EXAMPLE 18

TABLE 21 Extraction yield of ochratoxin from maize with combined use of the claimed substances 1,5-naphthyl disulphonic acid (1,5-NDS, 250 mM) and 4-hydroxy phenyl sulphonic acid (4-OH-PSN, 50 mM and 75 mM) at different pH values of 7.5 to 9.0 compared to reference extraction (ref., see also Table 2). The OD value was calculated in the commercially available ELISA RIDASCREEN ® Ochratoxin A 30/15. 250 mM 1,5-NDS 50 mM 4-OH-PSN 75 mM 4-OH-PSN pH pH pH pH pH pH pH pH Ref. 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 OD_(Blank) 1.551 1.342 1.249 1.210 1.265 1.244 1.223 1.139 1.108 OD_(Positive) 0.305 0.348 0.292 0.205 0.240 0.379 0.358 0.278 0.257 Signal 80 74 77 83 81 70 71 76 77 reduction [%]

EXAMPLE 19

TABLE 22 Extraction yield of ochratoxin from maize with combined use of the claimed substances 2,6-naphthyl disulphonic acid (125 mM) and 4-hydroxy phenyl sulphonic acid (different concentrations of 20 mM to 150 mM) at pH 8.0 (5 mM phosphate) compared to reference extraction (ref., see also Table 2). The OD value was calculated in the commercially available ELISA RIDASCREEN ® Ochratoxin A 30/15. Ref. 70 mM 60 mM 50 mM 40 mM 30 mM 20 mM OD_(Blank) 1.952 1.213 1.421 1.457 1.474 1.555 1.647 OD_(Positive) 0.441 0.327 0.430 0.395 0.494 0.452 0.409 Signal 77 73 70 73 67 71 75 reduction [%]

EXAMPLE 20

TABLE 23 Extraction yield of ochratoxin from maize with combined use of the claimed substances 2,6-naphthyl disulphonic acid (2,6-NDS, 125 mM) and 4-hydroxy phenyl sulphonic acid (4-OH-PSN, 50 mM and 75 mM) at different pH values of 7.5 to 9.0 compared to reference extraction (ref., see also Table 2). The OD value was calculated in the commercially available ELISA RIDASCREEN ® Ochratoxin A 30/15. 125 mM 2,6-NDS 50 mM 4-OH-PSN 75 mM 4-OH-PSN pH pH pH pH pH pH pH pH Ref. 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 OD_(Blank) 1.986 1.698 1.608 1.558 1.477 1.562 1.479 1.405 1.416 OD_(Positive) 0.484 0.408 0.292 0.358 0.266 0.424 0.342 0.281 0.329 Signal 76 76 82 77 82 73 77 80 77 reduction [%]

LEGEND FOR THE FIGURES

-   -   FIG. 1: List of mycotoxins of relevance to the food and animal         feed industries Next to the list, their chemical structural         formulae and their dissolving properties in an aqueous         environment are shown 

1. A method for extracting mycotoxins from grain and other food products or animal feed, wherein aqueous, buffered solutions of naphthyl and/or phenyl compounds and/or their heterocyclical analogues of formula I are used as extraction agents,

wherein X is naphthyl or phenyl residue or its heterocyclical analogues, R1 is at least one sulphonic acid group or at least one carbonic acid group, and R2 is unsubstituted or selected from a functional group of hydroxy, alkyl, alkoxy, amino, sulfhydryl, halogen and thioether, which are arranged in the o, m or p position in relation to the acid group in the molecule, wherein α-amino acids are excluded.
 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein one or more of the naphthyl and/or phenyl compounds and/or their heterocyclical analogues are used.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein X is naphthyl, R1 is disulphonic acid and R2 is hydroxy, or X is phenyl, R1 is sulphonic acid and R2 is hydroxy.
 4. The method according to claim 1, wherein 1,5-naphthyl sulphonic acid, 2,6-naphthyl disulphonic acid and/or hydroxyphenyl sulphonic acid are used.
 5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the naphthyl and/or phenyl compounds and/or their heterocyclical analogues are used in concentrations of 5 to 600 mM depending on their maximum solubility.
 6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the naphthyl and/or phenyl compounds and/or their heterocyclical analogues are applied as a solution, in powder or in tablet form.
 7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the aqueous solution of naphthyl and/or phenyl compounds and/or their heterocyclical analogues are buffered in the range of pH 5-10.
 8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the content of the extracted mycotoxins in antibody-supported systems is determined.
 9. The method according to claim 1, wherein the content of the extracted mycotoxins in chromatograph-supported systems is determined.
 10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the extracted mycotoxins are subjected to further cleaning using immunoaffinity chromatography columns.
 11. The use of the method according to claim 1 for removing aflatoxin B1, aflatoxin B2, aflatoxin G1, aflatoxin G2, aflatoxin M1, aflatoxin M2, fumonisin B1, fumonisin B2, fumonisin B3, deoxynivalenol, ochratoxin A, zearalenone, T-2, HT-2, citrinin, sterigmatocystin and ergot alkaloids.
 12. The method according to claim 8, wherein the antibody-supported systems are ELISA or lateral flow systems. 